'Scriba Stylus' pen designed by Dublin Design Studio

To rebrand or reinvent ?

Website Editor • Feb 26, 2020

You’re in the supermarket, searching for one of your favourites, scanning the rows of shelves with increasing impatience. You finally find it and realize, with horror, that it’s been rebranded. You crinkle your nose in disdain. You liked it the old way, it’s ugly now. Perhaps you’re being a little bit dramatic, but you just don’t care

People hate change, particularly with creature comforts like their favourite brands. Sometimes these changes are cosmetic (re-branding) and sometimes they cut deeper, a core change to a company or product’s purpose and identity (reinvention). Rebranding happens for a number of reasons: a brand is failing, has lost relevance or, less cynically, is going through a natural evolution to facilitate the growth of the brand.

Likewise, a product reinvention can be a positive innovation or a reactive scrambling for relevance. One represents the altering of the image of a product, the other represents a fundamental change.

Iterative rebranding is the most common: a company changing elements of their brand, like the logo or tagline - without fundamentally changing the identity of their brand. This a natural reaction, as very few logos are completely timeless - updates are needed to keeps brands looking modern. Sometimes rebranding is vital, like the Belgian chocolate company that changed their name from ISIS chocolate to Libeert for obvious reasons.

Display of ISIS chocolat bar now known ad Libeert chocolate

As we know though, people aren’t fond of change, so updates to popular brands can often result in backlash. Instagram’s rebranding, which simplified their iconic polaroid image to facilitate brand extension of their other apps (Boomerang, Hyperlapse and Layout). You may not have heard of these apps - this update brings them into the fold. People quickly got used to this logo though, adapting and forgetting quickly. AirBnB’s rebrand, which was suspiciously similar to existing brand logos, carries an important lesson that everyone should do their homework before rebranding.

As for rebranding for the purpose of remaining relevant is our favourite, but slightly bizarre, example is the diamond industry. After continuing drastic drops in sales (as a result of declining marriage rates) the industry was faced with reinventing the market that was almost single handedly created by the De Beers “A Diamond is Forever” campaign. The result was an attempt to appeal to millennials with a new tagline ‘Real is Rare’ and ads that depict unconventional, young relationships where marriage isn’t necessarily on the cards but a lasting commitment is. The ads feel like an Instagram post made flesh, a blurry image of what a ‘millennial’ is, with couples dramatically running through the woods, chasing chickens and saying things like “it will be wild, it will be kind and it will be real” - hey, we’ve all been there...

More drastic rebranding can act as a strategic decision to facilitate the growth of a brand. Diageo, formerly known as Guinness, rebranded in order to avoid confusion when extending their product line. This also allows each of their drinks to have their own unique identity and target market, with their parent brand remaining decidedly detached.

Drastic rebranding can also be a reaction to scandal or an ailing reputation - Ashley Madison’s parent company, Avid Life Media, changed their name to Ruby Corporation after the dating website, which facilitated affairs, was hacked and all its customer data released. The website also changed its tagline from “Life is short. Have an affair.” to the more innocuous “Find Your Moment.” It’s doubtful that’s enough to repair the irreparable damage done to its reputation though.

Closer to home, Eircom rebranded last year to simply Eir, spending millions on a complete brand overhaul to allow them to expand into different areas. However, many found this to be an empty exercise. After all, changing the face of a company doesn’t address the underlying issues people have with it. British Petroleum’s rebrand to BP, an attempt to distance themselves from their oil spill disaster in the gulf of Mexico, was met with much derision.
Display of all the liquor brand under the name of Diageo.
This is where reinvention comes in - a fundamental changing, or evolution, of identity. Products need consistent reinvention over the years to avoid becoming stale or irrelevant. Apple used to be pinnacle of this - not only were they constantly reinventing their own products, they borrowed/stole ideas from others in the industry and repackaged them into products that were decidedly more attractive to consumers. The iPad single handedly kickstarted the tablet market, which had been dead in the water before that.

Nintendo reinvented the home video game console market with Wii, completely reinventing the complicated interface of typical controllers with accessible and intuitive motion controls (and at the same time managed to coax a generation of gamers off the couch). While they haven’t been able to sustain this momentum, their incoming console Switch, wants to reinvent again by offering a console you can play on your TV or take on the go.

Another great example of reinvention in The National Geographic Society who, after realizing their sales were dropping due to being perceived as an old person brand, expanded their reach to TV programming (making shows targeted towards a younger audience) and put increased focus on social media, particularly Instagram (a platform that makes a perfect home for their beautiful photos). At the same time, unnecessary reinvention can be a mistake - take the “New Coke” disaster as an example.

Rebranding and reinvention both serve their own, sometimes overlapping, purposes. Both serve to modernise through different channels with the same goal - make the company or product more appealing to consumers. Their success varies wildly and it would be wise to learn from their mistakes and successes. After all, while people may dislike change, as designers can’t we make this as pleasant as possible for them?

Articles

23 Jun, 2020
The United Nations has described the disruption to education caused by the pandemic as ‘unparalleled’. At the virus’ worldwide peak in April, it is estimated that over 90% of all enrolled learners, from kindergarten to bachelors and beyond, had their education affected by school closures and the pandemic (UNESCO). For many university students and older children, they have had to adapt quickly to online learning. They can keep in touch with their peers and teachers online and continue their studies, albeit in a highly modified way. As challenging as this may be, this experience will help equip them for a future that is increasingly online. For parents of younger children, they are assuming a new role: their child’s home school teacher. This is in addition to their usual childcare and household duties, their work responsibilities and often emotional and financial worries caused by the pandemic. Stressful? Yes. The good, and somewhat surprising, news? The experts advise that you don’t teach your children - at least not in the way you might expect.
16 Jun, 2020
If the recent outbreak of Covid-19 has taught us anything, it's that many adults do not wash their hands effectively. It has never been more important that we support our children to develop good personal hygiene to keep themselves and our families safe. This seemingly easy task can be very difficult for children with fine motor skill difficulties. In this article, we explore some ideas to support your child with hand washing.
Person using VR Headset
10 Jun, 2020
Lockdown has brought the digital future into the now. Online shopping, entertainment, education and more have moved from the periphery to the mainstream to, in many cases, the only option. With the necessity of social distancing looking to continue for many months, it appears that this rapid digital revolution is here to stay. This means that life as we know it, in most of its sectors, has changed forever. In order to survive, businesses are having to adapt rapidly, embrace technology and look to the future. Architecture is no exception. There has been a widespread adoption of technology and VR over the past few months in response to the lockdown across all of society. Elderly grandparents who were once resistant to adopt new technologies talk of “Zooming” and have started video chatting with their family members to combat loneliness. Art galleries that were once considered stuffy or pretentious are now pioneers in VR technology, with Google Art & Culture offering tours of London’s National Gallery or the Musee D’Orsay in Paris. These virtual tours deliver art in a dynamic new way that can be far more engaging than regular photos. Critics have applauded the panoramic and immersive views of gallery building and exhibitions which work well for rendering of 2 dimensional art, however impressions of sculpture is somewhat lacklustre. With VR technology, users can enjoy a truly immersive experience in the comforts, and safety, of their own home. The COVID-19 pandemic has served as an accelerant for the arts and entertainment industries to embrace VR.
Show More
Share by: